Our direct human ancestor Homo erectus is older than we thought

An strange skullcap and countless numbers of clues have created a southern twist to the tale of human ancestors, in investigation published in Science on three April.

The rolling hills northwest of Johannesburg are well-known for fossils of human-like creatures termed hominins. Because of this, the spot is identified as the Cradle of Humankind.

“Through our subject college excavations at Drimolen, a student started uncovering a cluster of fragments. We could see that they were being components of a cranium. But they weren’t quickly identifiable,” states Ms Stephanie Baker.

Baker is a researcher and PhD applicant at the Palaeo-Research Institute at the College of Johannesburg. She manages investigation at the Drimolen fossil web page in the Cradle of Humankind exactly where the fragments of DNH 134 were being uncovered.

The worldwide crew was led by researchers from La Trobe College in Australia and Washington College in St. Louis in the United States.

Fossil forensics

Fossils that are millions of a long time outdated typically arrive out of the soil in fragments. The fragments will need to be rebuilt just before researchers can confidently determine what sort of animal they arrived from.

“Above the program of the subject time additional and additional fragments were being uncovered. We started piecing them together. No 1 could make a decision what this skullcap was from, until eventually 1 night time it all arrived together – and we realised we were being on the lookout at a hominin!” she states. They named the skullcap DNH 134.

The next query was – what sort of hominin? The Cradle of Humankind has numerous unique species of human ancestors and the Drimolen web page experienced at the very least two forms.

“This find definitely challenged us. We when compared the assembled skullcap to all of the other examples of hominins in the Cradle spot. At some point, its teardrop form and relatively significant brain cavity intended we were being on the lookout at Homo erectus,” states Baker.

Homo erectus is 1 of our direct human ancestors and is most effective identified for migrating out of Africa into the rest of the planet.

These hominins walked upright and were being a additional human-like species than the other hominins uncovered in the Cradle. They experienced shorter arms and longer legs. They could walk and operate for longer distances over the African grasslands than the some others.

How outdated?

Once the query of ‘which species?’ was answered, two other big issues presented themselves. How extensive back was this unique alive? And how outdated were being they when they died?

The researchers realized that no other Homo erectus fossils experienced ever been uncovered in South Africa just before. Even additional surprising was the time interval prompt by the soil levels the cranium fragments were being uncovered in.
“Prior to we uncovered DNH 134, we realized that the oldest Homo erectus in the planet was from Dmanisi in Georgia dating to 1.eight million a long time back,” states Baker.

Building a 3D puzzle over time

Attempting to figure out how outdated fossils are from the caves west of Johannesburg is fairly challenging. There were being no volcanoes through the time of the hominins, so there are no ash levels to give the researchers rapid age estimates, like they use for japanese African internet sites.

But when they were being uncovering the fragments at Drimolen, they kept and recorded each individual clue they could find. This involved fragments of smaller animals like bats and lizards, but also things like soil samples.

They can also inform particularly exactly where in 3D-house in the Drimolen quarry each individual minor fossil fragment was uncovered.

Then the investigation crew employed each individual probable dating approach obtainable to get the most correct probable day for the deposit. This involved Palaeomagnetic dating, Electron spin resonance, Uranium guide dating, and faunal dating.

Possible shifted, before origin

“We collated all of the dates from each individual of these procedures and together they confirmed that we experienced a incredibly exact age. We now know that the Drimolen Main Quarry and all of the fossils in it, are dated from two.04 to 1.ninety five million a long time back,” states Baker.

That indicates that DNH 134 is substantially older than the next oldest Homo erectus in Africa and from Georgia.

“The age of the DNH 134 fossil shows that Homo erectus existed 150,000 to two hundred,000 a long time before than formerly considered,” states Professor Andy Herries. Herries is the undertaking co-director with Ms Baker and guide researcher. He is Head of the Department of Archaeology and Historical past, at La Trobe College in Australia and an associate in the Palaeo-Research Institute at UJ.

Because Homo erectus is 1 of our direct ancestors, the discovery has implications for the origins of present day human beings.

“Until this find, we constantly assumed Homo erectus originated from japanese Africa. But DNH 134 shows that Homo erectus, 1 of our direct ancestors, possibly comes from southern Africa in its place. That would suggest that they later moved northwards into East Africa. From there they went by means of North Africa to populate the rest of the planet,” states Baker.

The cranium is also strange for the reason that it is the cranium of a young Homo erectus.

“The Homo erectus cranium we uncovered, was possible aged between two and a few a long time outdated when it died,” states Herries.

Sharing a landscape

The age of the DNH 134 skullcap shows a thing else – that a few species of early human ancestor lived in southern Africa at the same time at the Drimolen fossil web page.

“We can now say Homo erectus shared the landscape with two other kinds of human beings in South Africa, Paranthropus and Australopithecus,” states Herries.

This might suggest they needed to use unique components of the landscape to avoid competing with 1 a further. For a commence, they appeared unique.

Paranthropus robustus hominins were being shorter than Homo erectus and Australopithecus, states Baker.

Paranthropus robustus ate things like roots and tubers, which is why their teeth are definitely significant. They employed their tremendous teeth for grinding down what we get in touch with tumble-back again foodstuff – tricky challenging plants.”

Modifying climate

In comparison to the other two species, Homo erectus hominins were being tall and slender. They ate things which are a lot easier to digest, like fruits and berries.

“We also know that they were being feeding on meat, but we are not particularly certain how they were being receiving it nonetheless. We can say that at the very least these early Homo erectus weren’t looking with any weaponry nonetheless,” states Baker.

“We also know that they were being capable to deal with extensive distances. Which turned out blessed for them, for the reason that through their time, the weather altered in southern Africa.

Paranthropus and Australopithecus progressed in heat and humid climates and were being employed to that. But then the climate started to change from heat and humid, to neat and dry,” she states.

Steadily the tree-deal with diminished, and grasses took their position. At some point the forests were being changed with the African savannah grasslands of these days. The cooler climate suited the additional mobile and social Homo erectus better. But it intended that Paranthropus experienced to depend on less attractive foodstuff.

###

Additional Online video AND Photographs: For the clip lists, Hd video clip clips (1920X1080 25fps, video clip 15000kbps, audio 256kbps 48khz) and higher-resolution photographs (4288X2848 Raw/NEF) employed for the two films, speak to Therese van Wyk at +27 seventy one 139 8408 (mobile) or theresevw@uj.ac.za or download instantly from the Google Drive folder at https://travel.google.com/travel/folders/1vEw_OrqUeNd9vcaw9s2gdZVfrtI9l_Ye

INTERVIEWS: For interviews by using mobile phone / Skype / Zoom with Ms Stephanie Baker, speak to Ms Therese van Wyk at Theresevw@uj.ac.za or +27 seventy one 139 8407 (mobile) in Johannesburg, UTC + two.

For e mail-only interviews or issues, speak to Ms Stephanie Baker at stephanieb@uj.ac.za.